When Should Plaintiff Attorneys Speak Up, and When Should They Stay Silent?
In the world of plaintiff litigation, attorneys often find themselves balancing the need for legal strategy with the potential benefits of media attention. The media can be a powerful tool for raising awareness, influencing public opinion, and even impacting a case’s outcome. However, knowing when to speak up and share a case with the media, or when to stay silent, can be a delicate decision. The key often lies in the human element and the broader public interest. Here’s how plaintiff attorneys can navigate this balance.
When Should Plaintiff Attorneys Speak Up and Share Their Case with the Media?
First, do no harm.
If there is a chance that public attention or media coverage can negatively impact your case, or the psyche of your client, do not pass go. The goal is never media coverage; it is generating a positive outcome for the injured person you represent.
Assuming you have concluded, along with your client, that media coverage is important for the case or the cause, determine that is actually the story. For example, xcases with a strong human element are often the most newsworthy. Media outlets gravititate towards stories that evoke emotions—those that shine a light on injustice, personal suffering, or societal issues. If a case involves a clear human impact, such as a personal injury, wrongful death, or discrimination, sharing the story with the media can help amplify your client’s voice.
These cases resonate with the public because they highlight the real-life consequences of legal battles and often spark broader conversations about fairness, accountability, and justice.
In these types of cases, sharing the details with the media can humanize the legal battle and frame the plaintiff’s plight in a way that resonates with the audience. Attorneys can use the media as a tool to shape the narrative and inform key audiences, as well as help identify other victims or witnesses.
But once again, before doing so, it’s critical to assess the timing and ensure that the story aligns with the broader objectives of the case.
When Should Plaintiff Attorneys Stay Silent and Not Share Their Case?
Not all cases are media-worthy. Cases that lack a strong human narrative or that revolve solely around financial figures may not be of interest to the public. For instance, a breach of contract case with little human element or a case involving large sums of money but no tangible impact on real lives may not capture the media’s attention. The public is often more interested in stories they can emotionally connect with rather than financial numbers alone.
Additionally, sharing a case too early or without proper consideration could backfire. If the case is in its early stages and not fully developed, premature media exposure could complicate legal strategies or negatively influence potential jurors. In sensitive cases, particularly those that involve private details, keeping the matter confidential and avoiding unnecessary media exposure may be the best approach.
Related Resources:
Need help deciding if your cases are newsworthy? RebuttalPR can help – get in touch below.
